A cofounder does not automatically lose their shares simply because they stop working for the startup or resign as a director. Their position depends on the shares already issued, the agreed vesting or transfer arrangements, the company's Articles and applicable law. A departure should deal separately with ownership, office, work, money and access.
Treating all five as a single resignation can leave a business operating with an unresolved ownership dispute.
Establish the existing position before negotiating the exit
Collect the founders' agreement, Articles of Association, shareholders' agreement, employment or consultancy terms, share records and relevant approvals. Compare the signed documents with what the cap table says.
Then write down the facts both sides agree on. How many shares were issued? What consideration was paid? Is there an operative vesting arrangement, and what does it require on departure? Has an investor consent right been triggered? What payments or expenses remain outstanding?
An email saying “equity will vest over four years” may leave important implementation questions unanswered. Avoid assuming a spreadsheet can cancel shares that have already been issued.
Separate ownership from the director and employee roles
Section 168 of the Companies Act deals with director resignation; a share transfer is a separate process. Resignation does not erase liability for offences during the director's tenure. Company purchases of its own shares also have statutory conditions. [Source 1]
These distinctions affect the exit paperwork. A person may cease employment while remaining a shareholder, or leave the board while continuing as an adviser. Record each intended outcome and the process needed to achieve it.
Where shares are to move, settle who acquires them, the price or pricing mechanism, approvals, execution steps, tax and stamp implications, and any applicable dematerialisation or foreign-exchange requirements. Do not describe a transfer to another founder as a company buyback.
Work through a departure example
Imagine two founders, each holding 5,000 issued shares. One plans to leave after nine months. The continuing founder assumes the departing founder must return most of their shares because the original conversation mentioned a four-year commitment.
Before calculating a number, establish whether the signed documents create a workable transfer obligation, how it is triggered and who can enforce it. If the arrangement is unclear, the parties may need to negotiate a settlement. The business should not present an assumed revised cap table to an investor as if the transfer has already happened.
The same example shows why an exit price and an ownership percentage are different questions. A person agreeing to transfer shares may still dispute the consideration, payment date or release of other claims.
Document the handover in operational terms
Make a list of company assets and responsibilities the departing founder controls. This might include source-code repositories, domain registration, cloud administration, customer relationships, contracts, banking authority and physical equipment.
For each item, name the receiving person and define completion evidence. “Access handed over” is less useful than confirmation that the company owns the account, two administrators can access it and the recovery details have been updated.
Preserve business records and relevant evidence. Use an authorised access-transition process, especially where there is disagreement. Avoid deleting correspondence or making changes that destroy material needed to understand the dispute.
Check whether work created before incorporation or outside an employment arrangement was properly assigned to the company. If an assignment is missing, deal with it expressly in the settlement rather than assuming the exit letter fixes ownership.
Make settlement terms realistic
An exit document can address payments, the share transaction, handover, confidentiality, agreed communications and releases. Its conditions should make the sequence clear: what happens on signing, what follows payment and what proves completion.
Be careful with restrictions on future work. Section 27 of the Indian Contract Act restricts agreements restraining a lawful profession, trade or business, subject to exceptions. A broad post-exit non-compete should not be assumed enforceable merely because it is signed. [Source 2]
Also identify existing personal guarantees. Removing a name from the company's website or board does not demonstrate that a lender or counterparty has released a separate obligation. Obtain the relevant party's written position.
Frequently asked questions
Can the company simply delete the departing founder from its cap table?
No. The cap table should reflect the legally completed position. Establish and implement the relevant transaction before changing the ownership record to a new result.
Can an exit be amicable and still need documentation?
Yes. Clear records help both parties remember the agreed price, timing, ownership and handover, and help explain the outcome during diligence.
What if there is no founders' agreement?
Review the Articles, issued shares and other evidence of the arrangement. Identify what can be agreed now without pretending an unsigned arrangement already resolved the position.
Our founders' agreement guide covers decisions to make earlier. For an actual departure, explore founder ownership support and book an introductory call.
Sources checked 29 September 2026
- Source 1: Companies Act 2013, particularly sections 56, 68 and 168.
- Source 2: Indian Contract Act 1872 via WIPO Lex, section 27.
General information. An exit involving disputed rights, overseas shareholders or a company buyback needs transaction-specific advice.